Get Your NEW TheoryWear Before It’s GONE! ► https://theorywear.com/
Theorists, we’ve recently covered both the Dream SMP and ARGs here on Game Theory and our sister channel Film Theory. Today, we are closing the gap between the two with a brand new ARG from @Ranboo himself called Generation Loss. This is a BRAND NEW mystery and I am honestly very intrigued. Today I’m going to see what clues I can piece together out of the first video and see if we can predict the direction of this series.
Get Your Theory Wear!
Need Royalty Free Music for your Content? Try Epidemic Sound.
Get A 30 Day Free Trial! ► http://share.epidemicsound.com/MatPat
Credits:
Writers: Matthew Patrick, Zach Stewart and Tom Robinson
Editors: AbsolutePixel, Daniel Zemke, and Tyler Mascola
Sound Editor: Yosi Berman
#Ranboo #GenerationLoss #ARG #Minecraft #DreamSMP #ARGExplained #MinecraftARG #GameTheory #MatPat
THAT TRAITOROUS RINO!
“My favourite part about generation loss is seeing everyone being wrong about it” – Ranboo’s Twitter
If you look on the screen at 12:37, very bottom at x0.25 speed, it uncovers another word, however I can’t tell what it is. No idea if this means anything, but we’ll see.
“Everything has a purpose. Just not the purpose you think.” (hidden at the very end, turn up your brightness and look in the bottom right corner)
Don’t worry matpat, I know what a vhs is before I started watching you 🙂
And all this came from a creator of a block game
9:31
Harry Potter?
Generation loss more like lessons of learning
1
Very interesting
I just finished watching the video and had just been scrolling through the comments, i didn’t realize this was a very new video the hell, the comments aren’t even an hour old
Me:saw ranboo
My brain: CLICKKKK NOWW
my hands: *already clicked as fast as the speed of light*
Decaying winter lore video when?
Wow an arg about not being sheeple, nice
roses are red violets are blue if its a game theory video click it like you.
Woah
I am the only one seeing the Generation Loss logo sideways on the map of St. Peter’s Field at 10:20? I might be reading into it too deeply.